Regulation
The EU's new packaging rules, explained for fingerboard makers
What matters, what's noise, and what to actually do if you press decks, pour wheels, or build obstacles for a few hundred euros a month.
Last updated: 27 August 2026
Why you're hearing about this now
On 12 August 2026, a new EU law called the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation started applying across the EU: PPWR, or Regulation (EU) 2025/40 if you want to look it up. Since then, articles like "How Europe is killing makers and micro-entrepreneurs" have been going around maker communities, and the Hacker News thread under it collected every possible hot take, many of them wrong.
The short version for our scene: if you're a maker in the EU and you ship parcels directly to customers in other EU countries, this affects you, and one part of it is genuinely painful. Most of the rest of the regulation is noise for someone at our scale, at least until 2030.
Here's the whole thing, dissected.
The 30-second version
- You only sell inside your own country: nothing meaningful changed in August. You were already supposed to be registered with your country's packaging recycling scheme (yes, even as a tiny maker, more on that below). Sort that out and you're done.
- You ship directly to customers in other EU countries: each destination country now formally treats you as the "producer" of that packaging. That means registering there, paying into its recycling scheme, and, new since 12 August, appointing a representative established in that country. This is the expensive part, and there is no exemption for being small.
- You sell through a shop or distributor in another country: the shop that resells your boards normally becomes the producer there. Nothing extra for you.
- You ship outside the EU (UK, US, Japan, anywhere else): these rules don't apply to those parcels.
- The 10-tonne "small producer" threshold you may have read about only simplifies the reporting format. It is not an exemption. Nothing in this law exempts you for being small.
What this law actually is
Every EU country runs a system called extended producer responsibility (EPR) for packaging: whoever puts packaging into a country pays for collecting and recycling it. Fair enough in principle. The fees are based on weight and material, and at our scale they are genuinely tiny.
Buying your boxes from a local supplier changes nothing about this. That is the single most repeated mistake in the Hacker News thread, and the European Commission's official guidance distinguishes the two roles explicitly.
What actually changed (and what didn't)
Country-by-country packaging EPR is not new. Germany has required every seller shipping to German customers, foreign or not, to register in its LUCID register since 2019, and marketplaces have been legally required since 2022 to block sellers who ship to Germany without one. France requires a unique identifier (IDU) obtained through schemes like Citeo or Léko. Austria, Spain and others have similar systems. If you shipped decks to German customers in 2024, you were already supposed to be registered. Most small makers had never heard of any of this, and enforcement against a hobbyist shipping five parcels a month was essentially zero.
What the PPWR changed on 12 August 2026:
- The definitions are now EU-wide and explicit. If you sell at distance (online shop, Instagram DMs, Etsy, anything) directly to an end user in another EU country, you are the producer in that country. "End user" includes businesses that use your product, not just consumers.
- The genuinely new burden: a mandatory local representative. An EU maker selling directly to end users in another EU country must appoint an "authorised representative for extended producer responsibility" established in that country (Article 45(3) of the regulation). Before, most countries let a foreign EU seller register directly. Now you need a paid local stand-in for every EU country you ship to. This is where the fixed costs explode.
- Marketplaces and fulfilment companies become checkpoints. Platforms must collect your registration numbers for the countries you sell into, plus a declaration that you comply. Fulfilment providers must check too. This is what makes "nobody will enforce this" a risky bet: Etsy already requires a LUCID number to ship to Germany, and that model is now being extended EU-wide.
- What did not happen: any simplification. There are still 27 national systems, 27 registers, 27 fee schedules. The EU created a one-stop shop for VAT (OSS, with a €10,000 threshold below which home rules apply). It created nothing of the sort for packaging. No threshold, no single portal. The Commission's own FAQ confirms that staying under ten tonnes gets you simplified reporting, nothing more.
Does this apply to you?
Say Bob presses decks in Lyon and sells a few every month through his Big Cartel store and Instagram drops.
Sells a deck to a customer in France
France's existing system only. Register once at home, tiny annual declaration. No foreign representatives.
Ships a deck directly to a customer in Germany
He is the producer in Germany: German registration (LUCID), a German recycling scheme contract, and a German authorised representative. Repeat for every EU country he ships to.
Sells ten decks wholesale to a fingerboard shop in Berlin, which resells them
The shop, not Bob, is normally the producer in Germany. No German obligations for him.
Sells to a German customer through Etsy
Same as shipping directly. Etsy doesn't take over his obligations, and it will increasingly ask him to prove them.
Ships to a customer in the UK, US or Japan
Outside the scope of these rules entirely.
A small German company buys a deck for its office
Still counts as selling to an end user. Same as the consumer case.
The maths, in grams and euros
Let's put actual numbers on this, because they are absurd in both directions.
A typical single-deck shipment: a cardboard mailer (about 60 g of paper) plus a poly sleeve, tape and a label (about 10 g, mostly plastic). Ship 100 parcels a year and you've placed roughly 6 kg of paper and 1 kg of plastic on the market. The weight-based recycling fees on that, at real scheme rates, come to a euro or two.
The 10-tonne threshold for "simplified reporting"? At 70 g per parcel, that's about 140,000 parcels a year, one every four minutes, day and night, all year. Below it you get to report in broad categories instead of detailed material breakdowns. That is the entire concession to small producers.
What actually costs money is the admin, per country: registration, a scheme's minimum annual fee, and above all the mandatory representative. Commercial quotes for small sellers currently land somewhere around €100 to €400 per country per year all-in, sometimes less, sometimes more. These are market prices, not official tariffs: the Lectronz worked example, about €1,150 a year for four countries, lands in the same range. The Commission's own impact assessment says representative services generally cost hundreds to thousands of euros per country, cites one company paying €6,000 a year to cover 15 countries, and estimates the whole EU representative market at €1 to €2 billion a year.
Now put that against fingerboard margins. If you clear €10 to €20 on a deck, one country's compliance costs eat the profit of 5 to 40 decks a year before you've shipped anything. Three parcels a year to Spain cannot carry €150 of Spanish fixed costs. Forty parcels a year to Germany might carry €150 of German fixed costs, if Germany is your biggest market. That is the real effect of this law on a small maker: shipping to an EU country is no longer a checkbox in your store settings. It is a per-country business decision.
Your realistic options, country by country
For each EU country you currently ship to, you have three honest choices:
1. Comply where the volume justifies it. For your top one or two destination countries, get quotes. The same companies that sell packaging licences to small webshops are now bundling registration, scheme fees and representative services. Compare the yearly cost against your actual profit from that country.
2. Go through shops. This is the scene-native answer. If a fingerboard shop in another country buys your products and resells them, the shop normally becomes the producer there, not you. Wholesale and consignment deals with shops where your customers cluster don't just solve compliance: they put your boards in front of local riders and cut shipping costs for buyers too. It has to be genuine resale though, an actual shop actually reselling, not a friend's address forwarding parcels.
3. Turn off shipping where it isn't worth it. Uncomfortable but legitimate. Plenty of makers will end up shipping domestic plus non-EU worldwide, which is a strange outcome (easier to serve Japan than Belgium), but it's where the incentives point.
And a note for riders reading this: it just became one more reason to buy from makers in your own country when you can. You can browse brands by country for exactly that.
If you keep selling cross-border: the checklist
- Weigh your packaging. Kitchen scale, once per parcel type, split by material (paper, plastic). Ten minutes.
- Pull your last 12 months of orders by country. Count parcels per country. This is your decision table.
- Fix your home country first. Registering with your own national scheme predates the PPWR and is cheap. It's also the number a marketplace will ask you for first.
- Get quotes for your top destinations. Search for "packaging EPR" plus the country name, or ask your home scheme. Many providers now offer cross-border bundles. Decide with the numbers from steps 1 and 2.
- Close checkout shipping to countries that don't make the cut, or find a shop there (option 2 above).
- Keep a simple record. A spreadsheet with date, destination country, parcel type and grams per material is enough at this scale, and it turns any future declaration into a five-minute job.
- Don't get delisted by surprise. If you sell on Etsy or any marketplace, expect to be asked for registration numbers per country. Missing numbers will eventually mean blocked listings for those destinations, the way Germany already works.
The noise: things you can ignore for now
A lot of the scary coverage mixes the August 2026 rules with things that arrive years later. The timings below are from the Commission's FAQ.
2026
You are here
- Cross-border sellers are producers in the destination country
- Mandatory local representative for distance sales
- Marketplace and fulfilment checks begin
- PFAS limits (food packaging only)
2028
Or later
- Harmonised recycling labels on packaging
2030
Or later
- 50% empty-space limit for e-commerce
- Packaging minimisation rules
- Recyclability grades, recycled-content targets
- First reports into the harmonised EU register
So as a small maker, you do not currently need to redesign or relabel your packaging, shrink your boxes, hit recyclability grades, or report into any new EU portal. Keep using your current mailers, sleeves and boxes. And if you buy generic packaging off the shelf, documenting the packaging itself is the box manufacturer's job. (If you commission custom-printed packaging, you can take on that role on paper, but it doesn't change the shipping picture above.)
Myths going around, quickly
"Buy your packaging locally and you're exempt."
The box factory and the packaging producer are different legal roles. You ship the filled box, so you're the producer in the destination country, wherever the box was bought.
"Etsy or Amazon handles it for you."
Marketplaces are being turned into enforcers, not into your representative. Nothing transfers unless you explicitly contract a compliance service and the arrangement actually satisfies the regulation.
"Nobody will enforce this against a hobbyist."
Direct fines against a maker shipping ten parcels a month are unlikely. But marketplace blocks are automatic once platforms start checking, and Germany additionally has a cottage industry of competition-law warning letters (Abmahnungen) that has already targeted small sellers over missing LUCID registrations.
"This was designed to hand the market to Amazon."
The fixed-cost advantage for big players is real. Evidence of intent is not. Either way, it changes nothing about what you should do.
What might change soon
The Commission itself has acknowledged the problem and proposed suspending the mandatory representative requirement until 2035, as part of an "environmental omnibus" package. So far it hasn't gone well: in June 2026, the member states in the Council dropped that part after a large majority assessed it negatively (Council progress report). The proposal is now with the European Parliament: its environment committee votes first, and an indicative plenary vote is scheduled for 5 October 2026 (procedure file 2025/0395(COD)). Members have also proposed narrowing the suspension to micro and small businesses only, which would cover essentially every fingerboard maker.
Until something actually passes, the rule stands as written. We're watching this and will update this guide after the October vote.
The fix everyone actually wants, a single EU-wide registration like VAT's one-stop shop, or a real minimum threshold below which nothing applies, is not currently on the table. If you want to push for it, the small e-commerce trade associations in your country are collecting exactly these stories.
Corrections welcome. If something here doesn't match what you're seeing in the real world, get in touch on Instagram or Discord and we'll fix it.
Make fingerboard stuff?
Your brand should be easy to find, especially by riders in your own country. Add it to the directory in seconds.